The Lufkin Daily News
E-Newsletter Log In or Register as a New User 
Classifieds
Cars
Real Estate
Employment
Merchandise
E-mail this page Print this page Most E-mailed/Most printed
small medium large Type size


Health department survey: 19 died at Lufkin DaVita clinic in five-month period
Center was above state mortality average in 2007


The Lufkin Daily News

Tuesday, July 08, 2008

Nineteen patient deaths occurred at DaVita Lufkin Dialysis in a five-month period ending in April before its temporary closure, according to a survey released Monday by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services through an open records request.

A heavily-censored version of the same survey report was released June 30 by the Texas Department of State Health Services with the state citing what it says are exceptions to open records rules. Virtually all the information the 41-page page report contained in the state release was blacked out. The state has requested an opinion from the Texas Attorney General's Office on releasing information on the same survey the federal government has provided.

Joel Andrews/The Lufkin Daily News

 
RELATED STORIES

State and federal health officials conducted an extensive survey of the 700 S. John Redditt Drive Lufkin facility in mid-May following the facility's closure in late April after a spike in patient deaths and health complications. The center reopened July 2 after fixing staffing and operations problems to meet state-required standards.

DaVita spokesman Michael Chee has said the state survey conducted in May found no link between the deficiencies outlined in the report and patient deaths in early April. The state, which acts as a regulatory department making sure health facilities are operating within state guidelines, imposed a level three corrective plan of action at the Lufkin facility — the highest it can give out.

Chee has said facility staff noticed patient health complications in early April, but continued to operate because no source of the problems could be identified after the company conducted its own investigation.

The center temporarily closed its Lufkin doors April 28 and contacted authorities after two patients witnessed a nurse intentionally inject two patients with bleach, according to Lufkin police. Both patients survived and police have since charged former DaVita nurse Kimberly Clark Saenz, 34, with two counts of aggravated assault. Chee has previously said the company suspects the nurse is linked to a cluster of four patient deaths in early April. Police have not filed any additional charges.

The survey released Monday stated DaVita officials failed to monitor care provided to patients and did not immediately detect an increase in adverse events related to health and safety. It also found the facility did not keep complete and accurate patient medical records, including patient deaths which were not properly documented. Causes of death or possible death trends from September 2007 through April 2008 were not documented, the survey stated.

"There was no evidence of any root cause analysis, nor any evaluation of the potential existence of systemic issues," the survey report stated.

The facility had a 7.1 percent higher patient death rate in 2007 than the state average, at 27 percent from the state's 19.9 percent, according to the report. Thirty-two patient deaths occurred between Jan. 1 - Dec. 31, 2007, according to David Wright, spokesman for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Region VI office. And since the start of the new year through the facility's closure date, 16 patients have died, Wright said, totalling the number of patient deaths at 48 for DaVita Lufkin Dialysis. CMS works in conjunction with the U.S. health department, contracting state health departments to conduct a health surveys. The health surveys are done not only to make sure dialysis centers are in compliance with state licensing standards, but also with federal standards in order for them to be certified to receive CMS reimbursement funds. Reimbursement funds make up a large percentage of dialysis center profits.

The survey further found staff did not properly document an Adverse Occurrence Report Policy, which staff are instructed to fill out for "any unexpected event that is inconsistent with routine operation of a dialysis facility."

A review of a call list in the report showed 34 patients were transported to a local emergency room in April — more than twice the number of listings of any of other month. Only 19 of those patients taken to the ER in April were documented by the facility, the report stated.

During the state and federal health officials' review of 24 patient records, several requests were made to staff to provide documentation of laboratory reports, treatments and physician orders.

"In review of the records it was discovered that the records provided had missing or changed documentation..." the survey stated. "Failure to provide a complete record could potentially cause harm to a patient when the needed information is needed in a timely manner and information provided is incomplete or inaccurate."

The center has a history of being non-compliant with state standards, according to state surveys obtained by the newspaper through open records.

A survey conducted in July 2007 at the Lufkin center stated staff administered treatments to patients against doctors' orders. The surveyor noted she discovered the errors and told the facility administrator. She remained at the facility for the day until patient treatments were corrected, a state spokeswoman said. The surveyor returned a month later and documented that the facility was in compliance with its corrective plan of action.

Surveys conducted in 2003 and 2006 showed reuse technicians were not properly reprocessing used dialyzers according to industry standards and the company's own reuse policy. A follow-up survey to the 2003 report found the center had not corrected infection control problems. Another follow-up survey conducted a month later found the center was in compliance, a spokeswoman said. A follow-up report to the 2006 survey also found the center had complied.

Chee has called those survey reports isolated incidents, saying there is no connection between those reports and the closure or police investigation.

The center's July 2 reopening was met with opposition from four protestors whose family member died at the facility April 1. Wanda Hollingsworth, daughter of the late Thelma Metcalf, along with her sister-in-law, nephew and daughter, held up signs outside the center to gauge public response to the reopening. Several drivers passing by honked in support, as Hollingsworth and family waved signs.

Chee said the facility, which has an estimated 120-patient capacity, treated nine patients its first day back in operation, and is planning to phase in more patients over the next several weeks under state guidance. The state has required the facility have a physician, two nurses and a technical monitor on site to oversee staff and make sure the facility is operating according to state dialysis standards.

Vote for this story!

Comments

By Jennie

Nov 6, 2008 9:30 AM | Link to this

Yes, I was taught to measure bleach - using 10 cc's for disinfection of equipment. These machines are bleached for cleaning - could that be the source of the bleach? Or some other manner ... for this to happen on the open floor, I just hope this woman isn't a scape goat for some short cut. Oh yea shortcuts are done due to short staff. Happens everyday, they put on a show for the state. Davita needs to hire and train superior FA's and directors of the FA's. I worked at a huge center, everyday we were short staffed and patients were herded like cattle. Such a sin but its the truth.

By An oldtime patient

Oct 11, 2008 7:37 PM | Link to this

I've been on and off dialysis for 37 yrs. and in the last 10 yrs. through the same company. Which has been bought by DaVita. It's been only a few years now and there has been the usual up & downs that you get at any job. But our care givers are the best and I've come to know them as my friends. These people are caring and get concerned when I am ill. If there is a problem, then look at the individual that's causing it. The Bible says to not listen to those who are mutters meaning people that complain all the time and are just not happy. As a patient, I hear everything, and most of it is about each other. The Techs. and the nurses. I'm sorry that me being ill is a source of your problems, but we do have our own and if we don't meet your goals- oh well! I realize there are those patients that are impossible to work with, please remember that they aren't happy about thier circumstances.

By urbandjazz1

Oct 2, 2008 4:14 PM | Link to this

DaVita is indeed very money hungry!! They would not
support me on a physical threat from a patient.
Can not in good faith work for a company that would not
support me. Now working for FMC.

By Action needs to be made

Sep 18, 2008 12:46 PM | Link to this

This company is the worst. Trust me I know because I worked for them and they are a bunch of evil, coniving, money hungry people (Davita). Everything that I've read from articles and as well as from family members of patients that belong to Davita facilities all say the same thing. The state has also stated that they're basically always non compliant with the state. And that is true because I've done research about Davita in other states and they're all saying the same thing. We need to come together and put them out of business because patients are not getting the proper care. And the patients are paying their salaries and just making the big wigs of Davita richer and it's not fair. The unit I worked in New York is horrible and another unit has just closed down in New York as well. Please everyone come together and makea public stand to the media so the whole nation could know what Davita is all about. I will be making a stand to my state governor as well as the media real soon.

By Delia

Aug 21, 2008 8:19 PM | Link to this

What is going on with this situation? Is this nurse being charged, being let go or what? I would like an update.

By wow gold

Aug 6, 2008 1:49 AM | Link to this

wow gold
wow gold

By wow gold

Aug 6, 2008 1:42 AM | Link to this

wow gold
wow gold

By ex tech indiana

Jul 30, 2008 10:56 AM | Link to this

Obviously only the first line of my comment was read because i go on to explain that I cannot live my life being pissed for there decision on there own choice for there life. But i do get upset that i try and try to explain to them the bad decisions they make will ultimatly kill them. The resentment I feel I guess I should say is more towards other staff because of there lack of care for patients and there love for money, as well as higher up davita employees who do not actually work in a facility with these people, make it impossible for the pts to hear my voice because everyone else around us few caring staff is saying who cares just make sure your here and on time so we don't have any delays and you better not have any problems or will be really mad at you.

By concerned

Jul 29, 2008 11:18 AM | Link to this

There is no reason for resentment towards patients. The patients are the reason you have a job. Resent the company that promises you something that they know you will never get. If you are just there for the money you are in the wrong place. Sure, everyone goes to work to get a paycheck, but if that is the ONLY reason you go to work, you need to find another field to work in. Healthcare is no place for you. Love of money is what caused all of this in the first place. DaVita and their greed, not wanting to spend money where it needs to be spent and cutting corners that shouldn't be cut.

By another one

Jul 28, 2008 9:40 PM | Link to this

"Would we feel slight resentment to patients that do not meet there goals and affect the bonus" "a little sure!"

And, this tells it all. Patient care driven by bonuses? Resentment towards patients! Thanks for your honesty. If this is prevalent a closer look is warranted.

[1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10] next

Commenting is open from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. M-F, except on Tuesday when it's open until 9 p.m.

Post a comment



Remember me?

You may use the following formatting:
Bold: **this text will be bolded** = this text will be bolded
Italic: *this text will be italic* = this text will be italic
Link: [text to be linked](http://www.lufkindailynews.com) = text to be linked



There will be a delay of up to 5 minutes before your comment appears.


*HTML not allowed in comments. Your e-mail address is required.

 
 

Lufkin News | Lufkin Weather | Sports | Life | Business News | Opinions | Classifieds | Lufkin Cars | Lufkin Real Estate | Lufkin Jobs | Sitemap

Copyright 2008 The Lufkin Daily News. All rights reserved. - The Lufkin Daily News - Our Partners

By using this service, you accept the terms of our visitor agreement and privacy policy.
Registered site users, you may edit your profile.
Having trouble? Visit our help & FAQ.